Insight

EV Charging in Irish Developments: Why TIC vs OMC Is the Most Important Decision You Haven't Made Yet

Ireland's planning authorities have made their position on electric vehicle infrastructure clear: EV charging is no longer optional. For developers, this means navigating a new layer of technical and regulatory complexity before a sod is turned. Yet the most consequential question 'who will ultimately own, manage, and expand the EV infrastructure' is too often left unanswered until it is too late to matter. 

This article sets out what Irish developers need to understand about EV charging obligations, why the TIC/OMC distinction is fundamental to every aspect of the electrical design strategy, and what getting it wrong costs in practice. 

What Planning Conditions Now Require

Planning authorities across Ireland are applying EV conditions consistently and with increasing specificity. A typical requirement now includes: 

  • A minimum of 10% of car parking spaces should be provided as active EV charging spaces. Fully installed, energised, and operational at handover. While 10% is typically the baseline requirement set by local authorities, in our experience there is an increasing trend towards higher provisions, with some authorities now seeking 20% or even 100% of spaces to be equipped with active charging infrastructure.
  • The remaining spaces to be future-proofed, with containment and capacity in place for straightforward EV charging installation at a later date. 

On the surface this appears manageable. In practice, the engineering implications, particularly for basement and undercroft parking, are far-reaching, and the cost of under-designing at this stage is high.

Future-Proofing: What It Actually Means 

The phrase 'future-proofing' is frequently misunderstood, and sometimes deliberately interpreted as lightly as possible. It is not.

In surface car parks, future-proofing requires: 

  • Ducting installed beneath each parking space 
  • Routes carried back to a suitable distribution or connection point 
  • Adequate capacity and accessibility for future cabling, metering, and load management equipment 

 

In basement and undercroft parking, the requirements are more demanding: 

  • Full containment routed to every parking space 
  • Cable routes coordinated with structure, fire strategy, and ventilation from the outset 
  • Designated space for future distribution boards, metering infrastructure, and load management systems 

The TIC vs OMC Question: Why It Changes Everything

Whether a development is taken in charge (TIC) by the local authority or managed by an Owners' Management Company (OMC) fundamentally changes who owns the EV infrastructure, who pays for its expansion, and who is responsible for its long-term management. These are not administrative details. They determine the entire design strategy. 

TIC vs OMC

• Future-proofed ducting integrates into public infrastructure strategy. 

• Local Authorities can expand EV networks incrementally over time. 

• Standard ESB approaches to on-street charging apply more readily. 

• Long-term rollout responsibility is clearly assigned.

• The OMC inherits the full system at handover.

• Future installations require OMC agreement, funding, and third-party EV provider engagement.

• Load management and metering become significantly more complex. 

• Poor early design can make future expansion commercially or technically unviable.

Designing Without Knowing: The Real Risk 

When TIC vs OMC status is not confirmed at the early design stage, engineers are designing blind. This is not a theoretical concern, it is a live problem on developments across Ireland. 

The consequences of unclear ownership include: 

  • Incorrect assumptions baked into the metering strategy 
  • Inadequate allowance for future electrical load capacity 
  • Ducting and containment that is poorly located or unusable when the time comes to expand 
  • Conflicts between civil and electrical layouts that require costly redesign 
  • Delays when ESB Networks or local authorities seek clarification on public/private boundaries 

As ESB guidance makes clear, uncertainty around infrastructure ownership is a direct cause of connection delays and redesign. These delays have real cost and programme consequences for developers. 

What We Are Seeing on Live Projects 

Across a wide range of residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments, the same patterns emerge with notable consistency: 

  • EV strategies are redesigned late in the programme because ownership was not confirmed early 
  • Future-proofing is installed but proves unusable in practice due to routing or capacity shortfalls 
  • Basement containment is omitted or undersized at the coordination stage 
  • OMCs inherit EV infrastructure with no clear upgrade path, leaving residents and management companies unable to expand 
  • Energisation is delayed due to unresolved boundaries between public and private infrastructure

None of this is unusual anymore. All of it is avoidable with the right approach at the right stage. 

What Needs to Change

The solution requires discipline at the earliest stage of a project, not during detailed design, and certainly not during construction. 

01. Confirm TIC vs OMC status at planning stage 
02. Design EV infrastructure as a long-term system, not as a minimum compliance exercise 
03. Coordinate across civil, electrical, architectural, and planning disciplines from the outset 
04. Engage with ESB Networks early, particularly for non-standard or large-scale EV strategies 

AUTHOR
Martin O'Sullivan
Associate Director - Cork

Martin O’Sullivan is an accomplished professional with over a decade of experience in electrical disciplines. His career began as an electrician in the Irish Naval Service, where he swiftly transitioned to engineering. During his tenure in the Irish Naval Service, Martin served as the Ship’s Gunner, cultivating an unwavering commitment to precision and a ‘right first time’ ethos in overseeing the maintenance and operation of all onboard weapons. Additionally, he served as a Naval Diver, specializing in search patterns for underwater item location and recovery.

Martin holds a Certificate L7 in Building Information Modelling and a BEng in Electrical Engineering from CIT. His extensive background encompasses various roles, including a stint with IFF (formerly Dupont) in a Capital projects team, focusing on Electrical Infrastructure upgrades and site improvement projects ranging from under €1M to €10M. Notably, he played a pivotal role in the installation of a data centre in Dublin as part of the PSCS team.

His diverse experience extends to the maritime and construction sectors, with a particular emphasis on large-scale data centres and pharmaceutical capital projects. Starting as a Ships Electrical Artificer with the Irish Naval Service, Martin steadily progressed through the ranks from Project Engineer to Project Manager, reaching the position of Associate Director Electrical in the EDC Cork Office. Martin brings a methodical approach to his projects, ensuring their successful delivery.