INSIGHT

The Hidden Cost of Overglazing: How Excessive Glass Impacts SAP Energy Performance in High-Rise Development

The Hidden Cost of Overglazing: How Excessive Glass Impacts SAP Energy Performance in High-Rise Development

As architectural trends lean toward light-filled spaces and expansive views, glazing has become a defining feature of modern residential design. However, when it comes to energy performance assessments under SAP 10, overglazing can have a surprisingly negative impact on compliance.

In SAP, the Notional Dwelling, used to benchmark compliance, matches the actual dwellings design, but limits total glazing area to 25% of the dwelling’s total floor area.

Anything above this threshold in the actual design, is effectively compared against what would otherwise be a fully insulated wall with a U-value of 0.18 W/m²K. That’s a steep performance penalty: every square metre of additional glass introduces a significant increase in heat loss, which must then be offset elsewhere in the building’s design.

To mitigate overheating risks, larger glazed areas often require lower g-values (solar factors). While this helps control internal temperatures in summer, it also reduces beneficial solar gains in winter. The notional dwelling assumes a relatively high g-value of 0.63, providing useful solar heat when it’s needed most. By contrast, lower g-values can increase space heating demand during colder months, directly impacting the Fabric Energy Efficiency.

Once glazing performance drifts too far from the notional assumptions, other areas of the design must compensate. This can mean:

  • Upgrading walls, floors, or roofs to even lower U-values.
  • Improving air tightness and mechanical ventilation efficiency.
  • Improvement of thermal breaks, and additional insulation to minimise thermal bridging, a challenge with typical SFS construction.

These measures can quickly add complexity and cost, undermining the efficiency gains the glazing was intended to bring.

The solution isn’t to abandon glazing, but to plan it intelligently. By finding the right balance between daylight, heat loss, and overheating risk, designers can deliver both comfort and compliance.

Here are some practical design tips:

  • Optimise glazing area: Keep total openings below 25% of the floor area where possible.
  • Avoid very low-level glazing (<0.8 m) unless it serves as a fully openable door.
  • Maximise daylighting efficiently: Use high window heads and wider openings to bring in light without unnecessary heat loss.
  • Incorporate effective shading to manage solar gain dynamically.

By integrating these strategies early in design, it’s possible to achieve visually appealing, comfortable spaces that perform strongly in SAP calculations, without overburdening the rest of the building fabric.

AUTHOR
Carl Cappuccini
Energy & Sustainability Lead

Carl Cappuccini leads EDC’s Energy & Sustainability team with a career rooted in building performance, energy strategy, and a passion for impactful design. Beginning his journey through a surveying apprenticeship, Carl quickly found his focus in energy auditing and performance modelling — laying the groundwork for a career defined by technical expertise and real-world results.

With experience spanning both large firms and specialist consultancies, Carl has grown from a hands-on energy assessor to a strategic leader, guiding teams and shaping energy design strategies across everything from single residential units to full portfolio decarbonisation programmes.

At the core of Carl’s approach is a drive to deliver tangible outcomes. He excels in helping clients design smarter, more efficient buildings that go beyond compliance — and in supporting asset managers with clear, cost-effective decarbonisation pathways. Known for his collaborative mindset and ability to translate complex technical insights into actionable plans, Carl is committed to building a more sustainable future through innovation, data, and design.