When managing large-scale residential or commercial developments, selecting the right MEP consulting partner can be the difference between success and failure. Developers often bring MEP consultants in early for planning advice, but the real benefits of MEP consulting are fully realised when the consultant remains engaged throughout the entire project lifecycle. Here’s how EDC ensures a smoother, more successful outcome by maintaining a collaborative, full-project approach.
The Typical Process – And Where It Can Go Wrong
On many projects, developers engage an MEP consultant to provide initial input up to RIBA Stage 2 (Concept Design) or Stage 3 (Spatial Coordination). At this stage, the consultant’s involvement is often handed off to the main contractor, who takes over the design completion and construction. While this might seem efficient, gaps and inconsistencies can arise if the same MEP consultant is not involved beyond Stage 3, ultimately affecting the project’s final outcome.
Common Challenges with MEP Design Consultant disengaging at Stage 3
When the MEP consultant’s involvement ends prematurely, several issues can arise in Stage 4 due to insufficient coordination:
- Lack of Coordination: Misalignments between MEP systems and the building layout.
- Insufficient Plant Space: Equipment may not fit in the designated areas.
- Utility Capacity Issues: Inaccurate or inadequate assessment of utility requirements.
- Application Delays: Utility applications can stall without consistent follow-up.
- Risers and Cupboards Conflicts: Spaces for essential services are poorly planned.
- Insufficient Ceiling Voids: Overlooked clearance requirements for ceiling spaces can complicate installation.
- Missing or Misplaced Equipment: Key MEP components might be missing or incorrectly placed on plans.
- RIBA Stage 7 – Use: Stage 7 covers the ongoing use, operation, and maintenance of the building throughout its lifetime. We believe that stage 7 requirements should be considered as early as Stage 3. By addressing these elements early, the project team ensures that the building will continue to meet the client’s needs and performs efficiently throughout its lifecycle.
These issues stem from the lack of continuous MEP input as the design evolves. EDC has frequently stepped in to review projects affected by these complications, and we know they’re preventable with a more proactive, integrated process.
Observations from Delayed Engagement
When MEP consultants disengage too early, it can lead to a number of costly and frustrating challenges:
- Incorrectly Sized Ceiling Voids: In projects where properties are marketed and sold off-plan, adjustments such as lowering ceiling heights after sales can result in complications, causing developer headaches and dissatisfied buyers.
- Technical Inaccuracies in MEP Design: Issues like undersized systems and pipework often result in significant cost overruns and technical issues that need to be resolved after the contractor is appointed, which can cause friction between the contractor and the client at early stages.
- MEP Coordination Lagging Behind Structural Design: Structural work often progresses without complete MEP design, leading to missed MEP requirements in the building’s structure, such as builders’ work, letterbox openings, or incoming ducts. This oversight can require costly remediation.
- Planning Issues: Planning restrictions, such as limits on building height, can lead to coordination problems if not addressed early in the design process.
The Ripple Effect: Who’s Impacted and How
The consequences of these design shortfalls are far-reaching and can affect everyone involved in the project:
- Developers and Investors: Poorly coordinated MEP design can necessitate costly layout changes, reducing usable space and impacting revenue. Moreover, marketing materials and sales brochures can become outdated, creating discrepancies with customer expectations.
- MEP Contractors: Design gaps often lead to budget overruns and unreliable initial cost estimates. Missing details complicate the contractor’s ability to scope the work properly, causing delays and miscommunications that ultimately disrupt the project timeline.
- Design Team: Changes to MEP requirements may force architects and designers to revisit layouts, resulting in lost time and added costs. These revisions can delay planning approvals and reduce valuable amenity space, affecting property value and appeal.
- Main Contractors: Misalignments between MEP design and employer requirements (ERs) create confusion and can lead to costly corrections. These issues strain client relationships, cause delays, and increase costs. Delays in submitting Building Safety Regulator (BSR) documentation can further impact the timeline and budget, complicating project management.
Our Approach: What Works at EDC
At EDC, we believe that proactive, continuous engagement is key to successful MEP consulting. With extensive experience working alongside developers, main contractors, and MEP contractors, we understand the intricacies of large-scale projects. Our approach starts with early engagement to define project goals and build a solid foundation.
Drawing on insights from across the entire project, we ensure a comprehensive perspective, anticipating potential issues and addressing them early. Through ongoing design audits, we identify gaps before they develop into problems. Our commitment to remaining involved from design through to construction allows us to ensure a seamless, cohesive process that delivers results, making us the reliable partner for developers seeking the best MEP solutions from start to finish.
Our Clients
Who We Work With
The Author: Alan Tyrrell, Associate Director, London
Alan Tyrrell, Associate Director, has nearly 20 years of extensive experience in the construction industry. He has made his mark as a versatile professional adept in Project Management and in his Senior Electrical Engineering role.
Throughout his career, he has played a pivotal role in steering major landmark projects to successful completion, with a particular focus on high-specification commercial, office, residential, and retail developments. Alan’s expertise spans high-profile project Energy Strategies, Part L Requirements, Fire Engineering, and BREEAM standards.
Alan has particular expertise in engineering design for high-density residential developments and iconic London skyscrapers. His leadership qualities and hands-on knowledge, complemented by his qualifications as an electrician, form a solid combination of theoretical knowledge and on-site experience. He is focused on making his construction and design processes of the highest quality.
Email: atyrrell@edcengineers.com